Comparing Reduction With ESD- Versus APC-TORe
Comparing Outcomes of Classic Transoral Outlet Reduction (TORe) Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-TORe: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Obesity
- Roux-en-y Anastomosis Site
- Weight Gain
At a glance
- Phase
- Phase not stated
- Study type
- Interventional
- Sponsor
- Stephen Firkins
- Enrolment target
- 70
- Started
- 2 October 2023
- Main results due
- April 2028
- Study sites
- 1
- Registry updated
- 28 September 2026
Can you take part?
- Aged 18 years and over.
- Open to any sex.
- Healthy volunteers can take part.
These are the headline rules only. Every study has a longer list, and whether you are eligible is decided by the research team at the site — never by this page.
Read the full eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients with history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and weight regain * Dilated gastrojejunal anastamosis as diagnosed on endoscopy * Patients undergoing standard of care for treatment of obesity with endoscopic revisional procedure (a.k.a. TORe) who are enrolled in the GI Bariatric Endoscopy program and clinic at the study site Exclusion Criteria: * Prior revision of gastric bypass * Active and uncontrolled gastro-esophageal reflux disease defined as ≥ grade C esophagitis * Active untreated Helicobacter pylori infection * Malignancy newly diagnosed by endoscopy * Upper gastro-intestinal conditions such as ulcers, polyps, gastric varices, strictures, congenital or acquired intestinal telangiectasia or other abnormalities that preclude completion of TORe * Presence of gastrogastric or gastroenteric fistula * Inability to undergo general anesthesia * Participating in another ongoing clinical trial of an investigational weight loss drug or device * Active pregnancy * Use of anticoagulation therapy or P2Y12 inhibitors which cannot be discontinued for the time frame surrounding the procedure * Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus * Unwillingness to comply with standard post-TORe dietary guidelines and follow-up care * Any other anatomical, technical or otherwise factor that limits the ability of the endoscopist to perform either E-TORe or c-TORe * Any additional factor, which in the investigator's opinion, might jeopardize the subject's safety or compliance with the trial protocol
What this study is about
In the sponsor’s own words, from the registry.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two variations of the same procedure used to assist with weight loss in patients who have a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass who have experienced weight regain. The procedure being studied is called the Transoral Outlet Reduction (TORe), and the trial will compare two different ways to complete the TORe procedure. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
* Which variation of the TORe procedure results in more weight loss? * Which variation of the TORe is safer? Participants who are eligible and willing to undergo the TORe procedure to assist with weight loss will have the procedure completed either one of the two ways. All other care will be exactly the same between the two groups. Researchers will compare outcomes between the two procedure variations, looking at which one results in more weight loss, is more successful, and safer.
Study sites(1)
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Recruiting
Showing 1 of 1 sites. 1 of the 1 site on this study is recruiting right now — a site can stop enrolling while the study as a whole is still open.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06131281. Trialion does not run this study, is not paid to refer anyone to it, and cannot enrol you. Eligibility is always decided by the research team at the site.
Not the right study?
Answer three questions and see the studies recruiting near you, in plain language.
Find a study for me